https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1789
How does soil carbon sequestration affect greenhouse gas emissions from a sheep farming system? Results of a life cycle assessment case study
Submitted: 22 December 2020
Accepted: 8 April 2021
Published: 11 May 2021
Accepted: 8 April 2021
Abstract Views: 2340
PDF: 1024
HTML: 55
HTML: 55
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
A life cycle assessment (LCA) study of a transition from semiintensive to semi-extensive Mediterranean dairy sheep farm suggests that the latter has a strong potential for offsetting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through the soil C sequestration (Cseq) in permanent grasslands. The extensification process shows clear environmental advantage when emission intensity is referred to the area-based functional unit (FU). Several LCA studies reported that extensive livestock systems have greater GHG emissions per mass of product than intensive one, due to their lower productivity. However, these studies did not account for soil Cseq of temporary and permanent grasslands, that have a strong potential to partly mitigate the GHG balance of ruminant production systems. Our LCA study was carried out considering the transition from a semiintensive (SI) towards a semi-extensive (SE) production system, adopted in a dairy sheep farm located in North-Western Sardinia (Italy). Impact scope included enteric methane emissions, feed production, on-farm energy use and transportation, infrastructures as well as the potential C sink from soil Cseq compared to emission intensity. In order to provide a more comprehensive analysis, we used the following FUs: 1 kg of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) and 1 ha of utilised agricultural area (UAA). We observed that the extensification of production system determined contrasting environmental effects when using different FUs accounting for soil Cseq. When soil Cseq in emission intensity estimate was included, we observed slightly lower values of GHG emissions per kg of FPCM in the SI production system (from 3.37 to 3.12 kg CO2 equivalents – CO2-eq), whereas a greater variation we observed in the SE one (from 3.54 to 2.90 kg CO2-eq). Considering 1 ha of UAA as FU and including the soil Cseq, the emission intensity in SI moved from 6257 to 5793 kg CO2-eq, whereas values varied from 4020 to 3299 kg CO2-eq in SE. These results indicated that the emission intensity from semi-extensive Mediterranean dairy sheep farms can be considerably reduced through the soil Cseq, although its measurement is influenced by the models used in the estimation.
Highlights
- Extensification of dairy sheep systems provides an environmental benefit when soil C sequestration is considered.
- Extensification of dairy sheep systems determines lower environmental impact per hectare of utilized agricultural area.
- Enteric methane emissions are the main source of GHG emissions of the sheep milk life cycle.
- Carbon sequestration in permanent grasslands can considerably contribute to climate change mitigation.
Acar M, Celik I, Günal H, 2018. Effects of long-term tillage systems on aggregate-associated organic carbon in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 7:51-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.335329
Agri-footprint 4.0, 2017. LCA database Blonk Agri-footprint, Gouda, Netherlands.
Arzoumanidis I, Fullana-i-Palmer P, Raggi A, Gazulla C, Raugei M, Benveniste G, Anglada M, 2014. Unresolved issues in the accounting of biogenic carbon exchanges in the wine sector. J. Clean. Prod. 82:16-22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.073
Atzori AS, Furesi R, Madau FA, Pulina P, Rassu PG, 2015. Sustainability of dairy sheep production in pasture lands: a case study approach to integrate economic and environmental perspectives. Riv. Studi Sosten. 1:117-34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/RISS2015-001008
Baldini C, Gardoni D, Guarino M, 2017. A critical review of the recent evolution of life cycle assessment applied to milk production. J. Clean. Prod. 140:421-35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.078
Basset-Mens C, van der Werf HMG, 2005. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 105:127-44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007
Batalla I, Knudsen MT, Mogensen L, del Hierro O, Pinto M, Hermansen JE, 2015. Carbon footprint of milk from sheep farming systems in Northern Spain including soil carbon sequestration in grasslands. J. Clean. Prod. 30:1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.043
Beniston JW, DuPont ST, Glover JD, Lal R, Dungait JAJ, 2014. Soil organic carbon dynamics 75 years after landâ€use change in perennial grassland and annual wheat agricultural systems. Biogeochemistry 120:37-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-9980-3
Biddau R, Cidu R, 2005. Hydrogeochemical baseline studies prior to gold mining: a case study in Sardinia (Italy). J. Geochem. Explor. 86:61-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2005.04.001
Bolinder MA, Angers DA, Dubuc JP, 1997. Estimating shoot to root ratios and annual carbon inputs in soils for cereal crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 63:61-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01121-8
Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, VandenBygaart AJ, 2007. An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 118:29-42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.013
Brandão M, i Canals LM, 2013. Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18:1243-52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0381-3
Burle M, Mielniczuk J, Focchi S, 1997. Effect of cropping systems on soil chemical characteristics, with emphasis on soil acidification. Plant Soil. 190:309-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004266831343
Chessa AP, Delitala A, 1997. Il clima della Sardegna. In: Collana Note Tecniche di Agrometeorologia per la Sardegna. Servizio agrometeorologico regionale per la Sardegna. Chiarella Ed., Sassari, Italy, pp 17-38.
Cottle DJ, Nolan JV, Wiedemann SG, 2011. Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Anim. Prod. Sci. 51:491-514.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10163
Decandia M, Atzori AS, Acciaro M, Cabiddu A, Giovanetti V, Molina Alcaide E, Carro MD, Ranilla MJ, Molle G, Cannas A,2011. Nutritional and animal factors affecting nitrogen excretion in sheep and goats. In: Ranilla MJ, Carro MD, Ben Salem H, Moran d-Fehr P (Eds.), Challenging strategies to promote the sheep and goat sector in the current global context. Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; 99. CIHEAM/CSIC/Universidad de León/FAO, Zaragoza, Spain, pp 201-209.
dos Santos NZ, Dieckow J, Bayer C, Molin R, Favaretto N, Pauletti V, Piva JT, 2011. Forages, cover crops and related shoot and root additions in no-till rotations to C sequestration in a subtropical Ferralsol. Soil Tillage Res. 111:208-18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.10.006
EDA (European Dairy Association), 2018. Product environmental footprint category rules for dairy products. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR-DairyProducts_2018-04-25_V1.pdf
Eldesouky A, Mesias FJ, Elghannam A, Escribano M, 2018. Can extensification compensate livestock greenhouse gas emissions? A study of the carbon footprint in Spanish agroforestry systems. J. Clean. Prod. 200:28-38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.279
Escribano M, Elghannam A, Mesias FJ, 2020. Dairy sheep farms in semi-arid rangelands: a carbon footprint dilemma between intensification and land-based grazing. Land Use Policy 95:104600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104600
Escudero A, González-Arias A, del Hierro O, Pinto M, Gartzia-Bengoetxea N, 2012. Nitrogen dynamics in soil amended with manures composted in dynamic and static systems. J. Environ. Manage. 108:66-72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.046
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector - a life cycle assessment. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/k7930e/k7930e00.pdf
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2019. World food and agriculture - Statistical pocketbook. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/ca1796en/CA1796EN.pdf.
Fedele A, Mazzi A, Niero M, Zuliani F, Scipioni A, 2014. Can the life cycle assessment methodology be adopted to support a single farm on its environmental impacts forecast evaluation between conventional and organic production? An Italian case study. J. Clean. Prod. 69:49-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.034
Flyvbjerg B, 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual. Inq. 12:219-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G, 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Gislon G, Ferrero F, Bava L, Borreani G, Dal Prà A, Pacchioli MT, Sandrucci A, Zucali M, Tabacco E, 2020. Forage systems and sustainability of milk production: feed efficiency, environmental impacts and soil carbon stocks. J. Clean. Prod. 260:121012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121012
González-GarcÃa S, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Arroja L, 2013. Environmental life cycle assessment of a Galician cheese: San Simon da Costa. J. Clean. Prod. 52:253-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.006
Gutiérrez-Peña R, Delgado-Pertiñez M, Manca C, Addis M, Guzmán-Guerrero JL, Sitzia M, 2018. Comparing lamb’s meat quality of autochthonous sheep breeds Sarda and Mallorquina under different feeding management systems. In: 27th EGF General Meeting on ‘Sustainable meat and milk production from grasslands. Cork, Ireland, 23:748-750.
Gutiérrez-Peña R, Mena Y, Batalla I, Mancilla-Leytón JM, 2019. Carbon footprint of dairy goat production systems: A comparison of three contrasting grazing levels in the Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park (Southern Spain). J. Environ. Manage. 232:993-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.005
Hayashi K, Gaillard G, Nemecek T, 2006. Life cycle assessment of agricultural production systems: current issues and future perspectives. pp 98-109 in Proc of the International Seminar on Technology Development for Good Agriculture Practice (GAP) in Asia and Oceania. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Japan.
Horrillo A, Gaspar P, Dìaz-Caro C, Escribano M, 2021. A scenario-based analysis of the effect of carbon pricing on organic livestock farm performance: a case study of Spanish dehesas and rangelands. Sci. Total Environ. 751:141675.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141675
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007. The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers - Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis - Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2019. Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/vol4.html
ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006a. 14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Standard number 14040:2006. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006b. 14044 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. Standard number 14040:2006. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISPRA (Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale); De Lauretis R, Romano D, Vitullo M, Arcarese C (Eds.), 2011. National greenhouse gas inventory system in Italy; Year 2011. Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Environment Department, Rome, Italy.
King AE, Blesh J, 2018. Crop rotations for increased soil carbon: perenniality as a guiding principle. Ecol. Appl. 28:249-61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1648
Knudsen MT, Dorca-Preda T, Djomo SN, Peña N, Padel S, Smith LG, Zollitsch W, Hörtenhuber S, Hermansen JE, 2019. The importance of including soil carbon changes, ecotoxicity and biodiversity impacts in environmental life cycle assessments of organic and conventional milk in Western Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 215:433-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.273
Lai R, Arca P, Lagomarsino A, Cappai C, Seddaiu G, Demurtas CE, Roggero PP, 2017. Manure fertilization increases soil respiration and creates a negative carbon budget in a Mediterranean maize (Zea mays L.)-based cropping system. Catena 151:202-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.12.013
Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Samson R, 2013. Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 17:117-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x
Lorenz K, Lal R, 2018. Carbon sequestration in grassland soils. In: Carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems. Springer, Cham., pp 175-209.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92318-5_4
Macciotta NPP, Cappio-Borlino A, Pulina G, 1999. Analysis of environmental effects on test day milk yields of Sarda dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2212-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75467-6
Marino R, Atzori AS, D’Andrea M, Iovane G, Trabalza-Marinucci M, Rinaldi L, 2016. Climate change: Production performance, health issues, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies in sheep and goat farming. Small Rumin. Res. 135:50-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.12.012
Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS, 2005. Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Glob. Change Biol. 12:84-96.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001043.x
Moreno Ruiz E, Valsasina L, Fitzgerald D, Brunner F, Symeonidis A, Bourgault G, Wernet G, 2019. Documentation of changes implemented in the Ecoinvent database v3.6. Ecoinvent Association, Zürich, Switzerland. Available from: https://www.ecoinvent.org/files/change_report_v3_6_20190912.pdf
Nayak AK, Rahman MM, Naidu R, Dhal B, Swain CK, Nayak AD, Tripathi R, Shahid M, Islam MR, Pathak H, 2019. Current and emerging methodologies for estimating carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 665:890-912.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.125
Nemecek T, Kägi T, 2007. Life Cycle Inventories of Swiss and European Agricultural Production Systems. Final report ecoinvent V2.0 No. 15a. Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon Research Station ART, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Dübendorf, Switzerland. Available from: www.ecoinvent.ch
Notarnicola B, Sala S, Anton A, McLaren SJ, 2017. The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 140:399-409.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.071
O’Brien D, Bohan A, McHugh N, Shalloo L, 2016. A life cycle assessment of the effect of intensification on the environmental impacts and resource use of grass-based sheep farming. Agric. Syst. 148:95-104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.004
Paustian K, Andren O, Janzen HH, Lal R, Smith P, Tian G, Tiessen H, Van Noordwijk M, Woomer PL, 1997. Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions. Soil Use Manag. 13:230-44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1997.tb00594.x
Petersen BM, 2010. A model for the carbon dynamics in agricultural, mineral soils. Technical Report. Aarhus University, Denmark. Available from: www.agrsci.dk/c-tool
Petersen BM, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE, Halberg N, 2013. An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments. J. Clean. Prod. 52:217-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.007
Pirlo G, Carè S, Fantin V, Falconi F, Buttol P, Terzano GM, Masoni P, Pacelli P, 2014. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced in 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms. J. Dairy Sci. 97:6583-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8007
Porqueddu C, Melis RAM, Franca A, Sanna F, Hadjigeorgiou I, Casasús I, 2017. The role of grasslands in the less favoured areas of Mediterranean Europe. In: 19th EGF Symposium on ‘Grassland resources for extensive farming systems in marginal lands: major drivers and future scenarios - Grassland Science in Europe’. Alghero, Sardinia, Italy, 22:3-22.
PRé Consultants, 2018. Software LCA SimaPro Analyst 8.5.0.0.
Pulina G, Nudda A, 2002. Milk production. In: Dairy sheep feeding and nutrition. Avenue media (ed.), Bologna, Italy, pp 11-13.
Pulina G, Milán MJ, LavÃn MP, Theodoridis A, Morin E, Capote J, Thomas DL, Francesconi AHD, Caja G, 2018. Invited review: current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. J. Dairy Sci. 101:6715-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14015
Rural Development Programme of Sardinia, 2014-2020. Programma di sviluppo rurale PSR Sardegna. Available from: http://www.regione.sardegna.it/speciali/programmasvilupporurale/benvenuto-sul-sito-del-psr-2014-2020
Salou T, Le Mouël C, van der Werf HMG, 2017. Environmental impacts of dairy system intensification: the functional unit matters! J. Clean. Prod. 140:445-54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.019
Salvador S, Corazzin M, Romanzin A, Bovolenta S, 2017. Greenhouse gas balance of mountain dairy farms as affected by grassland carbon sequestration. J. Environ. Manage. 196:644-50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.052
Sardegna Agricoltura, 2013. Note tecniche sull'alimentazione degli ovini e dei caprini: Opuscolo n. 2. Available from: http://www.sardegnaagricoltura.it/documenti/14_43_20131002143844.pdf
Searates, 2021. Shipping to and from anywhere in the world. Find the best freight quote. Available from: https://www.searates.com
Seddaiu G, Bagella S, Pulina A, Cappai C, Salis L, Rossetti I, Lai R, Roggero PP, 2018. Mediterranean cork oak wooded grasslands: synergies and trade-offs between plant diversity, pasture production and soil carbon. Agrofor. Syst. 92:893-908.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0225-7
Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryzed S, Denef K, 2004. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res. 79:7-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008
Stanley PL, Rowntree JE, Beede DK, DeLonge MS, Hamm MV, 2018. Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems. Agric. Syst. 162:249-58.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.02.003
Tedeschi LO, Cannas A, Fox DG, 2008. A nutrition mathematical model to account for dietary supply and requirements of energy and nutrients for domesticated small ruminants: the development and evaluation of the small ruminant nutrition system. R. Bras. Zootec. 37:178-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300020
Vagnoni E, Franca A, Porqueddu C, Duce P, 2017. Environmental profile of Sardinian sheep milk cheese supply chain: A comparison between two contrasting dairy systems. J. Clean. Prod. 165:1078-89.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.115
Vermorel M, Jouany JP, Eugène M, Sauvant D, Noblet J, Dourmad JY, 2008. Evaluation quantitative des émissions de méthane entérique par les animaux d’élevage en 2007 en France. INRA Prod. Anim. 21:403-18.
How to Cite
Arca, P., Vagnoni, E., Duce, P., & Franca, A. (2021). How does soil carbon sequestration affect greenhouse gas emissions from a sheep farming system? Results of a life cycle assessment case study. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1789
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.