https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2023.2193

Beneficial interaction of allelopathic bacteria with chemical herbicides for sustainable wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production under wild oat (Avena fatua L.) infestation

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2023)
Published: 7 August 2023
Allelopathic bacteria, chemical control, integrated weed management, weed inhibition, wheat growth
Abstract Views: 696
PDF: 491
HTML: 102
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Muhammad Tauseef Jaffar College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Zahir Ahmad Zahir Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Jianguo Zhang • zhangjianguo21@nwafu.edu.cn College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
  • Abubakar Dar Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
  • Muhaimen Ayyub Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Hafiz Naeem Asghar Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Weeds are one of the major limiting factors for wheat production. So, a study was conducted to integrate allelopathic bacteria with a reduced dose of chemical herbicide for sustainable wheat production in wild oat infestation. Cyanide-producing Pseudomonas strains were applied in 4 combinations with and without 2 chemical herbicides (Axial and Atlantis) at the 25% and 50% recommended doses under axenic conditions. Results showed that the C4 bacterial combination (combination of B11×T19×T24×T75 bacterial strains) significantly reduced the growth and development of wild oat under 50% Axial while increasing wheat growth. Subsequently, C4 combination and Axial herbicide were selected for field evaluation, where they reduced the weed density (82.1%), soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value (26.0%), grain yield (88.2%) under 75% Axial, relative wild oat density (70.9%), photosynthetic rate (26.6%), and transpiration rate (25.6%) under 50% Axial in wild oat. While the C4 combination improved SPAD value (26.9%), shoot length (10.1%), tillering (33.3%), biological yield (32.7%), straw yield (24.4%), grain yield (46.8%), transpiration rate (9.6%), and stomatal conductance (14.7%) in wheat under 75% Axial. The increase in growth and yield of wheat was found to be similar to C4 under 50% and 75% Axial. Thus, it is concluded that allelopathic bacteria could be used with 50% Axial for sustainable wheat production under wild oat.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Ab Rahman SFS, Singh E, Pieterse CM, Schenk PM, 2018. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sci. 267:102-11.
Abbas T, Naveed M, Siddique S, Aziz MZ, Khan KS, Zhang J, Mustafa A, Sardar MF, 2020. Biological weeds control in rice (Oryza sativa) using beneficial plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 23:522-8.
Abbas T, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, 2017a. Bioherbicidal activity of allelopathic bacteria against weeds associated with wheat and their effects on growth of wheat under axenic conditions. Biocontrol 62:719-30.
Abbas T, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Aslam Z, 2017b. Biological control of broad-leaved dock infestation in wheat using plant antagonistic bacteria under field conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 24:14934-44.
Abd-Alla MH, Morsy FM, El-Enany AWE, Ohyama T, 2012. Isolation and characterization of a heavy-metal-resistant isolate of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae potentially applicable for biosorption of Cd2+ and Co2+. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 67:48-55.
Ali MA, Naveed M, Mustafa A, Abbas A, 2017. The good, the bad, and the ugly of rhizosphere microbiome. In: Kumar V, Kumar M, Sharma S, Prasad R (eds.) Probiotics and plant health. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 253-90.
Ashiq M, Aslam Z, 2014. Weeds and weedicides. Department of Agronomy, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan
Azam A, Shafique M, 2017. Agriculture in Pakistan and its Impact on Economy. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 103:47-60.
Bailey K, Boyetchko S, Derby J, Hall W, Sawchyn K, Nelson T, Johnson D, Spencer N, 2000. Evaluation of fungal and bacterial agents for biological control of Canada thistle (pp 203-8). Proc. 10th ISBCW. Bozeman, MT, USA.
Bailey K, Boyetchko S, Längle T, 2010. Social and economic drivers shaping the future of biological control: a Canadian perspective on the factors affecting the development and use of microbial biopesticides. Biol. Control 52:221-9.
Banowetz GM, Azevedo MD, Armstrong DJ, Halgren AB, Mills DI, 2008. Germination-arrest factor (GAF): biological properties of a novel, naturally-occurring herbicide produced by selected isolates of rhizosphere bacteria. Biol. Control 46:380-90.
Beckie HJ, Francis A, Hall LM, 2012. The biology of Canadian weeds. 27. Avena fatua L.(updated). Can. J. Plant Sci. 92:1329-57.
Bender C, Rangaswamy V, Loper J, 1999. Polyketide production by plant-associated pseudomonads. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 37:175-96.
Blair A, Ritz B, Wesseling C, Freeman LB, 2015 Pesticides and human health. Occup. Environ. Med. 72:81-2.
Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR, 2000. Plant growth-promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Can. J. Microbiol. 46:237-45.
Charudattan R, 2005. Ecological, practical, and political inputs into selection of weed targets: what makes a good biological control target? Biol. Control 35:183-96.
Chauvel B, Guillemin JP, Gasquez J, Gauvrit C, 2012. History of chemical weeding from 1944 to 2011 in France: changes and evolution of herbicide molecules. Crop Prot. 42:320-6.
Chen Y, Fan J-B, Du L, Xu H, Zhang QH, He YQ, 2014. The application of phosphate solubilizing endophyte Pantoea dispersa triggers the microbial community in red acidic soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 84:235-44.
Culliney TW, 2005. Benefits of classical biological control for managing invasive plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 24:131-50.
Dar A, Were E, Hilger T, Zahir ZA, Ahmad M, Hussain A, Rasche F, 2023. Bacterial secondary metabolites: possible mechanism for weed suppression in wheat. Can. J. Microbiol. 69:103-16.
Dar A, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Ahmad R, 2020. Preliminary screening of rhizobacteria for biocontrol of little seed canary grass (Phalaris minor Retz.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) in wheat. Can. J. Microbiol. 66:368-76.
De Prado R, Osuna MD, Fischer AJ, 2004. Resistance to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in a green foxtail (Setaria viridis) biotype in Europe. Weed Sci. 52:506-12.
Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Ptacek D, Okon Y, Vanderleyden J, 2002. Effect of inoculation with wild type Azospirillum brasilense and A. irakense strains on development and nitrogen uptake of spring wheat and grain maize. Biol. Fert. Soils 36:284-97.
Farooq M, Jabran K, Cheema ZA, Wahid A, Siddique KH, 2011. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:493-506.
Farooq M, Nawaz A, Ahmad E, Nadeem F, Hussain M, Siddique KH, 2017. Using sorghum to suppress weeds in dry seeded aerobic and puddled transplanted rice. Field Crop. Res. 214:211-8.
Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DRM, 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337-42.
Gravel V, Antoun H, Tweddell RJ, 2007. Growth stimulation and fruit yield improvement of greenhouse tomato plants by inoculation with Pseudomonas putida or Trichoderma atroviride: possible role of indole acetic acid (IAA). Soil Biol. Biochem. 39:1968-77.
Grossmann K, 1996. A role for cyanide, derived from ethylene biosynthesis, in the development of stress symptoms. Physiol. Plantarum 97:772-5.
Han HS, Lee K, 2006. Effect of co-inoculation with phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria on mineral uptake and growth of pepper and cucumber. Plant Soil Environ. 52:130-7.
Iqbal M, Khan MF, Suhail M, Zaman Q, 2017. Determinants of various factors for wheat production. J. Agric. Res. 55:379-85.
Jabran K, Mahmood K, Melander B, Bajwa AA, Kudsk P, 2017. Weed dynamics and management in wheat. Adv. Agron. 145:97-166.
Kao-Kniffin J, Carver SM, DiTommaso A, 2013. Advancing weed management strategies using metagenomic techniques. Weed Sci. 61:171-84.
Keel C, Schnider U, Maurhofer M, Voisard C, Laville J, Burger U, Wirthner PJ, Haas D, Défago G, 1992. Suppression of root diseases by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0: importance of the bacterial secondary metabolite 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol. Mol. Plant Microbe In. 5:4-13.
Korres NE, Norsworthy JK, Mauromoustakos A, 2019. Effects of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) establishment time and distance from the crop row on biological and phenological characteristics of the weed: implications on soybean yield. Weed Sci. 67:126-35.
Kozdrój J, Trevors J, Van Elsas J, 2004. Influence of introduced potential biocontrol agents on maize seedling growth and bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36:1775-84.
Kremer RJ, 2006. The role of allelopathic bacteria in weed management. In: Mukerji KG (ed.) Allelochemicals: biological control of plant pathogens and diseases. Springer, New York, USA, pp 143-55.
Kremer RJ, 2013. Interactions between the plants and microorganisms. Allelopathy J. 31:51-70.
Kremer RJ, Begonia MFT, Stanley L, Lanham ET, 1990. Characterization of rhizobacteria associated with weed seedlings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1649-55.
Kremer RJ, Caesar AJ, Souissi T, 2006. Soilborne microorganisms of Euphorbia are potential biological control agents of the invasive weed leafy spurge. Appl. Soil Ecol. 32:27-37.
Kremer RJ, Souissi T, 2001. Cyanide production by rhizobacteria and potential for suppression of weed seedling growth. Curr. Microbiol. 43:182-6.
Lacey LA, Shapiro-Ilan DI, 2008. Microbial control of insect pests in temperate orchard systems: potential for incorporation into IPM. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53:121-44.
Li J, Kremer RJ, 2006. Growth response of weed and crop seedlings to deleterious rhizobacteria. Biol. Control 39:58-65.
Mahajan G, Chauhan BS, 2021. Interference of wild oat (Avena fatua) and sterile oat (Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana) in wheat. Weed Sci. 69:485-91.
Mitchell T, 1991. Colonising Egypt: with a new preface. 1st ed. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Montgomery DC, 2017. Design and analysis of experiments. John wiley & sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Mustafa A, Naveed M, Saeed Q, Ashraf MN, Hussain A, Abbas T, Kamran M, Minggang X, 2019. Application potentials of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and fungi as an alternative to conventional weed control methods. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho M, Fujita M, Rodrigues Nogueira TA (eds.) Sustainable crop production. IntechOpen, London, UK.
Nehl D, Allen S, Brown J, 1997. Deleterious rhizosphere bacteria: an integrating perspective. Appl. Soil Ecol. 5:1-20.
Omer AM, Balah MA, 2011. Using of rhizo-microbes as bioherbicides of weeds. Glob. J. Biotech. Biochem. 6:102-11.
Peng G, Byer KN, 2005. Interactions of Pyricularia setariae with herbicides for control of green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Technol. 19:589-98.
Pimentel D, 2005. Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 7:229-52.
Príncipe A, Alvarez F, Castro MG, Zachi L, Fischer SE, Mori GB, Jofré E, 2007. Biocontrol and PGPR features in native strains isolated from saline soils of Argentina. Curr. Microbiol. 55:314-22.
Qin L, Jiang H, Tian J, Zhao J, Liao H, 2011. Rhizobia enhance acquisition of phosphorus from different sources by soybean plants. Plant Soil 349:25-36.
Rasi-Caldogno F, Cerana R, Pugliarello M, 1978. Effects of anaerobiosis on auxin-and fusicoccin-induced growth and ion transport. Experientia 34:841-2.
Razzaq A, Cheema ZA, Jabran K, Hussain M, Farooq M, Zafar M, 2012. Reduced herbicide doses used together with allelopathic sorghum and sunflower water extracts for weed control in wheat. J. Plant Prot. Res. 52:281-5.
Sahil, Mahajan G, Loura D, Raymont K, Chauhan BS, 2020. Influence of soil moisture levels on the growth and reproductive behaviour of Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana. PLoS One 15:e0234648.
Sargent JA, 1986. Herbicide-induced microbial invasion of plant roots. Weed Sci. 34:50-3.
Sarwar M, Kremer RJ, 1995. Enhanced suppression of plant growth through production of L-tryptophan-derived compounds by deleterious rhizobacteria. Plant Soil 172:261-9.
Scavo A, Mauromicale G, 2020. Integrated weed management in herbaceous field crops. Agronomy 10:466.
Siedow JN, Umbach AL, 2000. The mitochondrial cyanide-resistant oxidase: structural conservation amid regulatory diversity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1459:432-9.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA, 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, New York, USA, pp 352-8.
Sturz A, Christie B, 2003. Beneficial microbial allelopathies in the root zone: the management of soil quality and plant disease with rhizobacteria. Soil Tillage Res. 72:107-23.
Umbach AL, Ng VS, Siedow JN, 2006. Regulation of plant alternative oxidase activity: a tale of two cysteines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757:135-42.
Wu S, Cao Z, Li Z, Cheung K, Wong MH, 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma 125:155-66.
Zahir ZA, Ahmad M, Hilger TH, Dar A, Malik SR, Abbas G, Rasche F, 2018. Field evaluation of multistrain biofertilizer for improving the productivity of different mungbean genotypes. Soil Environ. 37:182-8.
Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Frankenberger W, 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Adv. Agron. 81:97-168.
Zaidi A, Khan MS, 2006. Co-inoculation effects of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and Glomus fasciculatum on green gram-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis. Turk. J. Agric. For. 30:223-30.
Zeller SL, Brandl H, Schmid B, 2007. Host-plant selectivity of rhizobacteria in a crop/weed model system. PLoS One 2:e846.

How to Cite

Jaffar, M. T., Zahir, Z. A., Zhang, J., Dar, A., Ayyub, M., & Asghar, H. N. (2023). Beneficial interaction of allelopathic bacteria with chemical herbicides for sustainable wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) production under wild oat (<i>Avena fatua</i> L.) infestation. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2023.2193
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.