https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2023.2209

A participatory approach to involve winegrowers in pesticide use reduction in viticulture in the south-western region of France

Vol. 18 No. 4 (2023): Special issue on "Co-designing sustainable cropping systems’ with stakeholders"
Published: 13 February 2024
Co-design, co-evaluation, on-farm experimentation, disease control
Abstract Views: 450
PDF: 512
HTML: 83
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Mickaël Perez • mickael.perez@vinovalie.com VINOVALIE R&D, Saint-Sulpice-la-Pointe; ABSys, University of Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Ciheam-IAMM, Montpellier; AGIR, INRAE, INPT, ENSAT, EI-PURPAN, University of Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan;, France.
  • Laure Hossard Department of Innovation, University of Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
  • Christian Gary ABSys, University of Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Ciheam-IAMM, Montpellier, France.
  • Pauline Lacapelle VINOVALIE R&D, Saint-Sulpice-la-Pointe, France.
  • Marie-Hélène Robin AGIR, INRAE, INPT, ENSAT, EI-PURPAN, University of Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
  • Aurélie Metay ABSys, University of Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Ciheam-IAMM, Montpellier, France.

Viticulture involves high pesticide use. While methods to reduce this use have been proposed by researchers, they have not yet been widely implemented by winegrowers. Involving winegrowers in the participatory design of new management strategies could encourage the adoption of these methods to reduce pesticide use. In this study, we designed and tested a participatory approach to reducing pesticide use that would be acceptable to winegrowers from a South-Western cooperative (i.e., not ‘pioneering’ winegrowers). The approach was composed of three main steps: A) co-design of the management strategies, B) implementation of the management strategies, and C) co-evaluation of the performances of the implemented management strategies. Winegrowers, researchers, advisors and engineers were involved in the study. The application of this participatory approach enabled the co-design and testing of two management strategies: IPM for Integrated Pest Management [50% reduction of pesticide treatment frequency index (TFI) as compared to the French High Environmental Value reference (HEV)], and ORG2kgCo for organic farming system with a maximum of 2 kg of copper/ha/year. These two management strategies were implemented by 11 winegrowers in three vineyards in South- Western France. In both management strategies, two main technical levers were selected to reduce pesticide use: a Decision Support System to optimise the use and substitution of pesticides by biocontrol products. The implementation of the IPM management strategy resulted in a significant reduction of TFI (from -14% to -57%, with an average of -25%, for all pesticides combined) compared to HEV, and the winegrowers who tested ORG2kgCo managed to not exceed the limit of 2 kg of copper per year. This original participatory approach, combining co-design workshops, on-farm experimentation and co-evaluation workshops, highlighted the benefits of involving winegrowers in the reduction of pesticide use.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Aka J, Ugaglia AA, Lescot J-M, 2018. Pesticide use and risk aversion in the French wine sector. J. Wine Econ. 13:451-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2018.55
Barzman M, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S, 2011. Comparative analysis of pesticide action plans in five European countries. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:1481-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2283
Brittain CA, Vighi M, Bommarco R, Settele J, Potts SG, 2010. Impacts of a pesticide on pollinator species richness at different spatial scales. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11:106-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.11.007
Catalogna M, Dubois M, Navarrete M, 2018. Diversity of experimentation by farmers engaged in agroecology. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38:50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0526-2
Chantre E, Guichard L, Ballot R, Jacquet F, Jeuffroy M-H, Prigent C, Barzman M, 2016. Co-click’eau, a participatory method for land-use scenarios in water catchments. Land Use Policy 59:260-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.001
Chantre E, Le Bail M, Cerf M, 2014. Une diversité de configurations d’apprentissage en situation de travail pour réduire l’usage des engrais et pesticides agricoles. Activites 11 Available from: http://journals.openedition.org/activites/1061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1061
Davy A, Raynal M, Vergnes M, Debord C, Codis S, Naud O, Deliere L, Fermaud M, Roudet J, Metral R, Bouisson Y, Davidou L, Guilbault P, Dupin S, Genevet B, Mahieux V, Baron M, Perot S, 2020. DeciTrait® : un OAD pour la protection de la vigne. Innov. Agron. 79:89-99.
Delecourt E, Joannon A, Meynard J-M, 2019. Work-related information needed by farmers for changing to sustainable cropping practices. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 39:28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0571-5
Fermaud M, Smits N, Merot A, Roudet J, Thiéry D, Wery J, Delbac L, 2016. New multipest damage indicator to assess protection strategies in grapevine cropping systems: an indicator of multipest damage in grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 22:450-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12238
Fouillet E, Delière L, Chartier N, Munier-Jolain N, Cortel S, Rapidel B, Merot A, 2022. Reducing pesticide use in vineyards. Evidence from the analysis of the French DEPHY network. Eur. J. Agron. 136:126503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126503
Giampietri E, Trestini S, 2023. Pro-environmental viticulture: status quo and perspectives from Prosecco Winegrowers in Italy. Sustainability 15:1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021073
Guichard L, Dedieu F, Jeuffroy M-H, Meynard J-M, Reau R, Savini I, 2017. Le plan Ecophyto de réduction d’usage des pesticides en France: décryptage d’un échec et raisons d’espérer. Cah. Agric. 26:14002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017004
Hill SB, MacRae RJ, 1996. Conceptual framework for the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture. J. Sustain. Agric. 7:81-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v07n01_07
Hossard L, Guichard L, Pelosi C, Makowski D, 2017. Lack of evidence for a decrease in synthetic pesticide use on the main arable crops in France. Sci. Total Environ. 575:152-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.008
Hossard L, Jeuffroy MH, Pelzer E, Pinochet X, Souchere V, 2013. A participatory approach to design spatial scenarios of cropping systems and assess their effects on phoma stem canker management at a regional scale. Environ. Model. Softw. 48:17-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.014
Hossard L, Schneider C, Voltz M, 2022. A role-playing game to stimulate thinking about vineyard management practices to limit pesticide use and impacts. J. Clean. Prod. 380:134913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134913
Inserm, 2021. Pesticides et effets sur la santé : Nouvelles données, EDP Sciences. Montrouge.
IVSO, 2022. Économie des vins du Sud-ouest. Available from: https://www.vignobles-sudouest.fr/economie/
Jeuffroy M-H, Bergez J-E, David C, Flénet F, Gate P, Loyce C, Maupas F, Meynard J-M, Reau R, Surleau-Chambenoit C, 2008. Utilisation des modèles pour l’aide à la conception et à l’évaluation d’innovations techniques en production végétale: bilan et perspectives: In: Systèmes de culture innovants et durables. Éducagri éditions, pp 109-28. Available from: https://www.cairn.info/systemes-de-culture-innovants-et-durables-2008—9782844446855-page-109.htm?ref=doi DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/edagri.reau.2008.01.0109
Jeuffroy M-H, Loyce C, Lefeuvre T, Valantin-Morison M, Colnenne-David C, Gauffreteau A, Médiène S, Pelzer E, Reau R, Salembier C, Meynard J-M, 2022. Design workshops for innovative cropping systems and decision-support tools: Learning from 12 case studies. Eur. J. Agron. 139:126573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126573
King C, Gunton J, Freebairn D, Coutts J, Webb I, 2000. The sustainability indicator industry:where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of indicators. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 40:631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99148
Kummer S, Milestad R, Leitgeb F, Vogl CR, 2012. Building resilience through farmers’ experiments in organic agriculture: examples from Eastern Austria. Sustain. Agric. Res. 1:308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v1n2p308
Lacombe C, Couix N, Hazard L, 2018. Designing agroecological farming systems with farmers: A review. Agric. Syst. 165:208-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.06.014
Lacoste M, Cook S, McNee M, Gale D, Ingram J, Bellon-Maurel V, MacMillan T, Sylvester-Bradley R, Kindred D, Bramley R, Tremblay N, Longchamps L, Thompson L, Ruiz J, García FO, Maxwell B, Griffin T, Oberthür T, Huyghe C, Zhang W, McNamara J, Hall A, 2021. On-farm experimentation to transform global agriculture. Nat. Food 3:11-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00424-4
Lairez J, Lopez-Ridaura S, Jourdain D, Falconnier GN, Lienhard P, Striffler B, Syfongxay C, Affholder F, 2020. Context matters: agronomic field monitoring and participatory research to identify criteria of farming system sustainability in South-East Asia. Agric. Syst. 182:102830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102830
Larsen AE, Patton M, Martin EA, 2019. High highs and low lows: elucidating striking seasonal variability in pesticide use and its environmental implications. Sci. Total Environ. 651:828-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.206
Le Bellec F, Rajaud A, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Bockstaller C, Malezieux E, 2012. Evidence for farmers’ active involvement in co-designing citrus cropping systems using an improved participatory method. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32:703-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0070-9
Leclère M, Loyce C, Jeuffroy M-H, 2018. Growing camelina as a second crop in France: A participatory design approach to produce actionable knowledge. Eur. J. Agron. 101:78-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.08.006
Leclère M, Loyce C, Jeuffroy M-H, 2023. A participatory and multi-actor approach to locally support crop diversification based on the case study of camelina in northern France. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 43:13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00871-2
Mailly F, Hossard L, Barbier J-M, Thiollet-Scholtus M, Gary C, 2017. Quantifying the impact of crop protection practices on pesticide use in wine-growing systems. Eur. J. Agron. 84:23-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.12.005
Masson JE, Soustre-Gacougnolle I, Perrin M, Schmitt C, Henaux M, Jaugey C, Teillet E, Lollier M, Lallemand J-F, Schermesser F, GIEE Westhalten, Isner P, Schaeffer P, Koehler C, Rominger C, Boesch M, Rué P, Miclo Y, Bursin A, Dauer E, Hetsch JM, Burgenath M, Bauer J, Breuzard M, Muré V, Cousin F, Lassablière R, 2021. Transdisciplinary participatory-actionresearch from questions to actionable knowledge for sustainable viticulture development. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00693-7
Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté Alimentaire Français, 2022. Le plan Écophyto, qu’est-ce que c’est ? Available from: https://agriculture.gouv.fr/le-plan-ecophytoquest-ce-que-cest
Montaigne E, Coelho A, Khefifi L, 2016. Economic issues and perspectives on innovation in new resistant grapevine varieties in France. Wine Econ. Policy 5:73-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2016.11.002
Nolot J-M, Debaeke Pippe, 2003. Principes et outils de conception, conduite et évaluation de systèmes de culture. Cah. Agric.:387-400.
Pant LP, Hambly Odame H, 2009. The promise of positive deviants: bridging divides between scientific research and local practices in smallholder agriculture. Knowl. Manag. Dev. J. 5:160-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18716340903201504
Pereira Á, Turnes A, Vence X, 2017. Barriers to shifting to a servicized model of crop protection in smallholding viticulture. J. Clean. Prod. 149:701-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.126
Pertot I, Caffi T, Rossi V, Mugnai L, Hoffmann C, Grando MS, Gary C, Lafond D, Duso C, Thiery D, Mazzoni V, Anfora G, 2017. A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture. Crop Prot. 97:70-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.025
Puech C, Brulaire A, Paraiso J, Faloya V, 2021. Collective design of innovative agroecological cropping systems for the industrial vegetable sector. Agric. Syst. 191:103153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103153
Raynal M, Davadan L, Lely D, Magot C, Gizardin F, Taillée M, Robichon G, 2022. Experimentation in the vineyard of an insurance protocol to cover the harvest’s risk of damage due to cryptogamic diseases linked to the reduction of phytosanitary inputs (T. Caffi, V. Rossi, & G. Fedele, Eds.). BIO Web Conf. 50:04008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20225004008
Robin M-H, Colbach N, Lucas P, Montfort F, Cholez C, Debaeke P, Aubertot J-N, 2013. Injury profile simulator, a qualitative aggregative modelling framework to predict injury profile as a function of cropping practices, and abiotic and biotic environment. II. Proof of concept: design of IPSIM-Wheat-Eyespot (M. Convertino, Ed.). PLoS ONE 8:e75829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075829
Romero P, Navarro JM, Ordaz PB, 2022. Towards a sustainable viticulture: the combination of deficit irrigation strategies and agroecological practices in Mediterranean vineyards. A review and update. Agric. Water Manag. 259:107216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107216
Salembier C, Elverdin JH, Meynard J-M, 2016. Tracking on-farm innovations to unearth alternatives to the dominant soybeanbased system in the Argentinean Pampa. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0343-9
Serrano E, Petit A, Gaviglio C, Gontier L, Dufourcq T, Cogo R, Massol T, Mora J, Rafenne X, Cichosz B, 2019. Ecoviti Sud-Ouest: performances de systèmes viticoles innovants à faible niveau d’intrants phytopharmaceutiques sur le bassin de production Sud Ouest. Innov. Agron. 76:254-72.
Skardon J, 2011. The role of trust in innovation networks. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 26:85-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.565
Toffolini Q, Jeuffroy M-H, 2022. On-farm experimentation practices and associated farmer-researcher relationships: a systematic literature review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42:114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00845-w
Urruty N, Deveaud T, Guyomard H, Boiffin J, 2016. Impacts of agricultural land use changes on pesticide use in French agriculture. Eur. J. Agron. 80:113-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.07.004

How to Cite

Perez, M., Hossard, L., Gary, C., Lacapelle, P., Robin, M.-H., & Metay, A. (2024). A participatory approach to involve winegrowers in pesticide use reduction in viticulture in the south-western region of France. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2023.2209
Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.