Nitrate framework directive and cross compliance: two case studies from the MO.NA.CO. monitoring network

Submitted: 2 November 2015
Accepted: 2 November 2015
Published: 14 March 2016
Abstract Views: 960
Article - Italian: 371
Article - English: 359
Technical Report: 547
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Marisanna Speroni marisanna.speroni@crea.gov.it CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Paolo Bazzoffi CREA-ABP Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Agrobiology and Pedology, Italy.
  • Lamberto Borrelli CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Antonio Bruni CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Gianluca Brusa CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Giovanni Cabassi CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Maurizio Capelletti CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Sara Carè CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Luigi Degano CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.
  • Roberto Fucella CREA-FLC Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics, Research Centre for Fodder crops and Dairy productions, Italy.

The Act A4 refers to Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 91/676 / EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. The A4 Act applies to farms that have land within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ); it also applies to farms, with or without herds, that participate in measure 214 of the Rural Development Plans. The monitoring was performed in two experimental farms belonging to CREA-FLC. Both monitoring sites are located in  vulnerable areas designated by the Lombardy Region. In the monitoring period MO.NA.CO., the regional standard of reference were the Decrees of the Regional Government DGR5868 / 2007 and DGR2208 / 2011. The average cost attributable to administrative requirements was about € 600 / year / company and was mainly due to a professional agronomist who prepared the Agronomic Utilization Plan (PUA), assisted the farm in preparing its communication, provided advice and informed farm managers on regulatory updates. An informal, not systematic survey made possible to detect that the cost to fulfil the obligations of communication can be very variable depending on the farm’s characteristics (size, production, size of the herd) and the type of consultant assisting the breeder (freelancer, association, cooperative). For example, in some cases the cost is based on the area of the farm, in others on the number of animals in the herd; and in other situations, the associations and freelance agronomist apply a flat rate for the compilation of the PUAs which is unaffected by farm characteristics and ranging from a minimum of € 100 / year / company practiced by some farmers’ association to a maximum of € 800 / year / company required by some freelance agronomist. At Baroncina farm the storage capacity of the slurry, during the monitoring period, was not compliant with the law because the volumes produced could not be stocked for 120 days as required by the standard. New storage facilities have been designed and built; the overall cost of implementation of new tanks was about € 50 / m3.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Supporting Agencies

Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry policies (MiPAAF)

How to Cite

Speroni, M., Bazzoffi, P., Borrelli, L., Bruni, A., Brusa, G., Cabassi, G., Capelletti, M., Carè, S., Degano, L., & Fucella, R. (2016). Nitrate framework directive and cross compliance: two case studies from the MO.NA.CO. monitoring network. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 10(s1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2015.720