Foliar application of plant-based biostimulants improve yield and upgrade qualitative characteristics of processing tomato

https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1825

Authors

  • Eugenio Cozzolino Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Caserta, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-4072
  • Ida Di Mola | ida.dimola@unina.it Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici (NA), Italy.
  • Lucia Ottaiano Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici (NA), Italy.
  • Christophe El-Nakhel Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici (NA), Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-2834
  • Youssef Rouphael Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici (NA), Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-8651
  • Mauro Mori Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici (NA), Italy.

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is a diffused worldwide vegetable. Great amounts of fertilizers are often applied for increasing yield and quality, without considering the negative effect on the environment. A possible perspective for reducing this risk is to raise the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) through the use of plant biostimulants, which also improve yield and quality concomitantly. The aim of the current study was to verify the potential beneficial effect of three vegetal-based biostimulants on agronomical, qualitative and nitrogen use efficiency of a processing tomato crop. The experiment provided three biostimulants (an extract of brown seaweed [SwE], a legume-derived protein hydrolysate [LDPH] and a tropical plant extract). The following assessments were carried out: marketable and unmarketable yields, mean fruits weight, firmness, pH, total soluble solids (TSS), colour parameters (a/b), hydrophilic antioxidant activity (HAA), lipophilic antioxidant activity (LAA), total ascorbic acid content (AsA), total phenols, nitrate and total nitrogen content, nitrogen use efficiency, N-uptake efficiency, and N-utilization. The foliar application of biostimulants especially protein hydrolysates and seaweed extract significantly affected the marketable yield with an average increase of 18.3% over the control and 41.3% average decrease in unmarketable yield. The N-use and N-uptake efficiency followed a similar trend, with biostimulants boosting it higher than control, +18.4% and +59.3%, respectively; the nitrogen content was also higher in fruits of sprayed plants: +21.3% over control. This finding also reflects on higher dry matter accumulation and firmness in fruits of treated plants (+10.9% and +14.1% over control, respectively). The biostimulants application, in particular SwE and LDPH, also boosted TSS (+12.8%), the a/b colour ratio (+7.5%), HAA and AsA (9.8% and 114.6%, respectively). Therefore, the legume-derived protein hydrolysates and extract of brown seaweed Ecklonia maxima seem a good sustainable approach to improve yield and quality of tomato for canning industries.

Highlights
- The effects of three plant-based biostimulants on yield and quality of processing tomato was explored.
- Application of protein hydrolysates and seaweed extract improve marketable yield.
- The biostimulants had different effect on nutritional and functional quality of tomato.
- Hydrophilic antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid content increased under protein hydrolysate application.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali N, Farrell A, Ramsubhag A, and Jayaraman J, 2016. The effect of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on the growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato under tropical conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 28:1353-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0608-3

Aujla MS, Thind HS, Buttar GS, 2007. Fruit yield and water use efficiency of eggplant (Solanum melongema L.) as influenced by different quantities of nitrogen and water applied through drip and furrow irrigation. Sci. Hortic. 112:142-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.020

Brandt S, Pék Z, Barna É, Lugasi A, Helyes L, 2006. Lycopene content and colour of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. J. Sci. Food Agri. 86:568-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2390

Bremner JM, 1965. Total nitrogen. pp 1149-1178 in C.A. Black, D.D. Evans, I.L. White, L.E. Ensminger, F.E. Clark (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c32

Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, & Ferrante A, 2015. Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Bio. Agri. Hort. 31:1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2014.964649

Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW, 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 383:3-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8

Cammarano D, Ronga D, Di Mola I, Mori M, Parisi M, 2020. Impact of climate change on water and nitrogen use efficiencies of processing tomato cultivated in Italy. Agr. Water Manage. 241:106336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106336

Caruso G, De Pascale S, Cozzolino E, Giordano M, El-Nakhel C, Cuciniello A, Rouphael Y, 2019a. Protein hydrolysate or plant extract-based biostimulants enhanced yield and quality performances of greenhouse perennial wall rocket grown in different seasons. Plants 8:208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070208

Caruso G, Giordano M, Cozzolino E, Cuciniello A, Cenvinzo V, Bonini P, Colla G, Rouphael Y, 2019b. Yield and nutritional quality of Vesuvian Piennolo tomato PDO as affected by farming system and biostimulant application. Agronomy 9:505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090505

Chapman NH, Bonnet J, Grivet L, Lynn J, Graham N, Smith R, Sun G, Walley PG, Poole M, Causse M, Graham JK, Baxter C, Seymour GB, 2012. High-resolution mapping of a fruit firmness-related quantitative trait locus in tomato reveals epistatic interactions associated with a complex combinatorial locus. Plant Physiol. 159:1644-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.200634

Colla G, Cardarelli M, Bonini P, Rouphael Y, 2017a. Foliar applications of protein hydrolysate, plant and seaweed extracts increase yield but differentially modulate fruit quality of greenhouse tomato. HortSci. 52:1214-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12200-17

Colla G, Hoagland L, Ruzzi M, Cardarelli M, Bonini P, Canaguier R, Rouphael Y, 2017b. Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Front. Plant Sci. 8:2202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02202

Colla G, Rouphael Y, Canaguier R, Svecova E, Cardarelli M, 2014. Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis. Front. Plant Sci. 5:448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00448

Cozzolino E, Giordano M, Fiorentino N, El-Nakhel C, Pannico A, Di Mola I, Mori M, Kyriacou MC, Colla G, Rouphael Y, 2020. Appraisal of biodegradable mulching films and vegetal-derived biostimulant application as eco-sustainable practices for enhancing lettuce crop performance and nutritive value. Agronomy 10:427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030427

de Jong M, Mariani C, Vriezen WH, 2009. The role of auxin and gibberellin in tomato fruit set. J. Expt. Bot. 60:1523-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp094

Del Giudice R, Petruk G, Raiola A, Barone A, Monti DM, Rigano MM, 2016. Carotenoids in fresh and processed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruits protect cells from oxidative stress injury. J. Sci. Food Agric. 97:1616-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7910

Di Mola I, Conti S, Cozzolino E, Melchionna G, Ottaiano L, Testa A, Mori M, 2021. Plant-based protein hydrolysate improves salinity tolerance in Hemp: agronomical and physiological aspects. Agronomy 11:342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020342

Di Mola I, Cozzolino E, Ottaiano L, Nocerino S, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Mori M, 2020a. Nitrogen use and uptake efficiency and crop performance of baby spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) and lamb’s lettuce (Valerianella locusta L.) grown under variable sub-optimal N regimes combined with plant-based biostimulant application. Agronomy. 10:278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020278

Di Mola I, Cozzolino E, Ottaiano L, Giordano M, Rouphael Y, El-Nakhel C, Mori M, 2020b. Effect of seaweed (Ecklonia maxima) extract and legume-derived protein hydrolysate biostimulants on baby leaf lettuce grown on optimal doses of nitrogen under greenhouse conditions. Aust. J. Crop Sci.14:1456-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.09.p2511

Di Mola I, Ottaiano L, Cozzolino E, Senatore M, Giordano M, El-Nakhel C, Sacco A, Rouphael Y, Mori M, 2019. Plant-based biostimulants influence the agronomical, physiological, and qualitative responses of baby rocket leaves under diverse nitrogen conditions. Plants. 8:522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110522

Djidonou D, Zhao X, Simonne EH, Koch KE, Erickson JE, 2013. Yield, water and nitrogen-use efficiency in field-grown, grafted tomatoes. HortSci. 48:485-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.4.485

du Jardin P, 2015. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 196:3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021

Du YD, Cao HX, Liu SQ, Gu, XB, Cao YX, 2017. Response of yield, quality, water and nitrogen use efficiency of tomato to different levels of water and nitrogen under drip irrigation in Northwestern China. J. Integr. Agr. 16:1153-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61371-0

Ertani A, Pizzeghello D, Francioso O, Sambo P, Sanchez-Cortes S, Nardi S, 2014. Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: Chemical and metabolomic approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 5:1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00375

Ertani A, Cavani L, Pizzeghello D, Brandellero E, Altissimo A, Ciavatta C, Nardi S, 2009. Biostimulant activity of two protein hydrolyzates in the growth and nitrogen metabolism of maize seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.172:237-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200800174

Fernández V, Eichert T, 2009 Uptake of hydrophilic solutes through plant leaves: current state of knowledge and perspectives of foliar fertilization. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci 28:36-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902743069

Flores P, Hellin P, Fenoll J, 2009. Effect of manure and mineral fertilization on pepper nutritional quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89:1581-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3627

Fogliano V, Verde V, Randazzo G, Ritieni A, 1999. Method for measuring antioxidant activity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant capacity of wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:1035-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980496s

Hawkesford M, Kopriva S, De Kok L (Eds.), 2014. Nutrient use efficiency in plants - Concepts and approaches. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10635-9

Hawkesford M, Horst W, Kichey T, Lambers H, Schjoerring J, Møller IS, White P, 2012. Functions of macronutrients. In Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Acad. Press. 135-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00006-6

Huang Y, Lu R, Chen K, 2018. Prediction of firmness parameters of tomatoes by portable visible and near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Engine. 222:185-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.11.030

Kader AA, 2002. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops, p. 535. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Publication n. 3311.

Kalt W, 2005. Effects of production and processing factors on major fruit and vegetable antioxidants. J. Food Sci. 70:R11-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb09053.x

Kampfenkel K, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, 1995. Extraction and determination of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate from plant tissue. Anal. Biochem. 225:165-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1127

Khanam UKS, Oba S, Yanase E, Murakami Y, 2012. Phenolic acids, flavonoids and total antioxidant capacity of selected leafy vegetables. J. Funct. Foods 4:979-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2012.07.006

Koukounararas A, Tsouvaltzis P, Siomos AS, 2013. Effect of root and foliar application of amino acids on the growth and yield of greenhouse tomato in different fertilization levels. J. Food Agric. Environ. 11:644-8.

Kyriacou MC, Rouphael Y, 2018. Towards a new definition of quality for fresh fruits and vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 234:463-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.046

Lucini L, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Canaguier R, Kumar P, Colla G, 2015. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic proï¬ling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Sci. Hortic. 182:124-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.022

Maach M, Boudouasar K, Akodad M, Skalli A, Moumen A, & Baghour M, 2020. Application of biostimulants improves yield and fruit quality in tomato. Int. J. Vege. Sci. 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2020.1780536

Nangare DD, Singh Y, Kumar PS, Minhas PS, 2016. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by deficit irrigation regulated on phenological basis. Agri. Water Manag. 171:73-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.016

Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Schiavon M, Ertani A, 2016. Plant biostimulants: Physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 73:18-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006

ParaÄ‘iković N, Vinković T, Vinković VrÄek I, Žuntar I, Bojić M, Medić-Å arić M, 2011. Effect of natural biostimulants on yield and nutritional quality: an example of sweet yellow pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Sci. Food Agri. 91:2146-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4431

Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C, 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 26:1231-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3

Rolland F, Moore B, Sheen J. 2002. Sugar sensing and signalling in plants. Plant Cell. 14:S185-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010455

Ronga D, Pentangelo A, Parisi M, 2020. Optimizing N fertilization to improve yield, technological and nutritional quality of tomato grown in high fertility soil conditions. Plants 9:575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050575

Ronga D, Parisi M, Pentangelo A, Mori M, Di Mola I, 2019. Effects of nitrogen management on biomass production and dry matter distribution of processing tomato cropped in southern Italy. Agronomy 9:855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120855

Rouphael Y, Giordano M, Cardarelli M, Cozzolino E, Mori M, Kyriacou M, Bonini P, Colla G, 2018a. Plant and seaweed-based extracts increase yield but differentially modulate nutritional quality of greenhouse spinach through biostimulant action. Agronomy 8:126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8070126

Rouphael Y, Kyriacou MC, Petropoulos SA, De Pascale S, Colla G, 2018b. Improving vegetable quality in controlled environments. Sci. Hortic. 234:275-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.033

Rouphael Y, Colla G, Graziani G, Ritieni A, Cardarelli M, and De Pascale S, 2017a. Phenolic composition, antioxidant activity and mineral proï¬le in two seed-propagated artichoke cultivars as affected by microbial inoculants and planting time. Food Chem. 234:10-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.175

Rouphael Y, Colla G, Giordano M, El-Nakhel C, Kyriacou M C, & De Pascale S, 2017b. Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 226:353-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.007

Schiavon M, Ertani A, Nardi S, 2008. Effects of an alfalfa protein hydrolysate on the gene expression and activity of enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and nitrogen metabolism in Zea mays L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56:11800-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802362g

Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM, 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. In: Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 299:152-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1

Subbarao SB, Aftab Hussain IS, Ganesh PT, 2015. Biostimulant activity of protein hydrolysate: influence on plant growth and yield. J. Plant Sci. Res. 2:125.

Villarreal-Sánchez JA, Ilyina A, Mendez-Jiménez LP, Robledo-Torres V, Rodríguez-Herrera R, Canales-López B, Rodríguez-Martínez J, 2003. Isolation of microbial groups from a seaweed extract and comparison of their effects on a growth of pepper culture (Capsicum annuum L.). Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 44:92-6.

Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A, 2017. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 4:5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5

Downloads

Published
2021-03-23
Keywords:
Solanum Lycopersicum L., sustainable agriculture, tropical plant extract, seaweed, protein hydrolysates, fruits quality, soluble solids, nitrogen efficiency.
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 753

  • PDF: 281
How to Cite
Cozzolino, E. ., Di Mola, I., Ottaiano, L., El-Nakhel , C., Rouphael, Y., & Mori, M. (2021). Foliar application of plant-based biostimulants improve yield and upgrade qualitative characteristics of processing tomato. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1825

Most read articles by the same author(s)