https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1830
Salinity tolerance evaluation of barley germplasm for marginal soil utilization
Submitted: 9 February 2021
Accepted: 25 May 2021
Published: 6 July 2021
Accepted: 25 May 2021
Abstract Views: 983
PDF: 395
Appendix: 104
HTML: 63
Appendix: 104
HTML: 63
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
One greenhouse experiment was conducted to assess the tolerance to salinity and water deficit stresses of 184 barley varieties (breeding lines or registered varieties). Also, a 2-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate the growth and yield components of 16 of these varieties, representing tolerant, intermediate tolerant and susceptible ones, grown simultaneously in saline and nonsaline soils. In the greenhouse, the K-means cluster analysis shown that 17 varieties were tolerant, 72 varieties intermediate tolerant, 16 varieties intermediate susceptible and 79 varieties susceptible. In the field, soil salinity reduced the germination of the barley varieties except for the varieties ICB 100126, Scarlett and Meteor. Barley varieties grown in the saline soil produced 33.2-to 83.4% lower dry biomass, 0.0-to 78.9% fewer ears and 0.0-to 81.5% lower grain yield than those of varieties grown in the nonsaline soil. In the saline soil, the greatest grain yield was provided by the vars. Galt Brea ‘S’ and ICB 100126 (4.87 and 4.31 t ha–1, respectively), without significant differences between saline and non-saline soils. In most barley varieties, chlorophyll content and photosystem II quantum yield were greater under saline than under non-saline conditions. The results of this research indicated that, in barley germplasm, a remarkable genetic variation exists which would contribute to barley production in saline soils.
Highlights
- The salinity tolerance of 184 barley varieties was investigated.
- There was great variability to salinity tolerance among barley germplasm.
- There were barley varieties which grown in saline soil without significant yield reduction.
- Barley could be an alternative crop system in soils with increased salinity.
Aliakbari M, Cohen SP, Lindlöf A, Shamloo-Dashtpagerdi R, 2021. Rubisco activase A (RcaA) is a central node in overlapping gene network of drought and salinity in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and may contribute to combined stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 161:248-58.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.016
Amarasinghe SL, Watson-Haigh NS, Byrt C, James R, Qiu J, Berkowitz O, Whelan J, Roy SJ, Gilliham M, Baumann U, 2019. Transcriptional variation is associated with differences in shoot sodium accumulation in distinct barley varieties. Environ. Exp. Bot. 166:103812.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103812
Ashraf M, Arfan M, Shahbaz M, Ahmad A, Jamil A, 2002. Gas exchange characteristics and water relations in some elite okra cultivars under water deficit. Photosynthetica 40:615-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024368522742
Belkhodja R, Morales F, Abadia A, Comez-Aparisi J, Abadia J, 1994. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiol. 104:667-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.2.667
Binott JJ, Owuoche J, Bartels D, 2017. Physiological and molecular characterization of Kenyan barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seedlings for salinity and drought tolerance. Euphytica 213:139.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1924-2
Bor M, Özdemir F, Türkan I, 2003. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritime L. Plant Sci. 164:77-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00338-2
Dell’Aversana E, Hessini K, Ferchichi S, Fusco GM, Woodrow P, Ciarmiello LF, Abdelly C, Carillo P, 2021. Salinity duration differently modulates physiological parameters and metabolites profile in roots of two contrasting barley genotypes. Plants 10:307.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020307
Derakhshani Z, Bhave M, Shah RM, 2020. Metabolic contribution to salinity stress response in grains of two barley cultivars with contrasting salt tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 179:104229.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104229
Hammami Z, Gauffreteau A, BelhajFraj M, Sahli A, Jeuffroy M-H, Rezgui S, Bergaoui K, McDonnell R, Trifa Y, 2017. Predicting yield reduction in improved barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties and landraces under salinity using selected tolerance traits. Field Crops Res. 211:10-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.018
Herrero J, Pérez-Coveta O, 2005. Soil salinity changes over 24 years in a Mediterranean irrigated district. Geoderma 125:287-308.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.09.004
Karanlik S, Aslanyurek D, 2021. Differences in dry matter production, chlorophyll and ion content of bread wheat, durum wheat, barley, oat and rye under salinity stress. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 29:10769-79.
Katerji N, van Hoorn JW, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M, Fares C, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Oweis T, 2006. Classification and salt tolerance analysis of barley varieties. Agric. Water Manag. 85:184-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.04.006
Lancashire PD, Bleiholder H, Langelüddecke P, Stauss R, van den Boom T, Weber E, Witzen-Berger A, 1991. An uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119:561-601.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1991.tb04895.x
Li R, Shi F, Fukuda K, Yang Y, 2010. Effects of salt and alkali stresses on germination, growth, photosynthesis and ion accumulation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 56:725-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00506.x
Liu X, Mak M, Babia M, Wang F, Chen G, Veijanoski F, Wang G, Shabala S, Zhou M, Chen Z-H, 2014. Linking stomatal traits and expression of slow anion channel genes HvSLAH1 and HvSLAC1 with grain yield for increasing salinity tolerance in barley. Front. Plant Sci. 5:634.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00634
Long NV, Dolstra O, Malosetti M, Kilian B, Graner A, Visser RG, van der Linden CG, 2013. Association mapping of salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 126:2335-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2139-0
Mahlooji M, Seyed Sharifi R, Razmjoo J, Sabzalian MR, Sedghi M, 2018. Effect of salt stress on photosynthesis and physiological parameters of three contrasting barley genotypes. Photosynthetica 56:549-56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-017-0699-y
Moradi F, Ismail AM, 2007. Responses of photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and ROS-scavenging systems to salt stress during seedling and reproductive stages in rice. Ann. Bot. 99:1161-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm052
MSTAT-C, 1988. A microcomputer program for the design, management, and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Crop and Soil Sciences Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Munns R, Tester M, 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:651-81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
Niazi MLK, Mahmood K, Malik KA, 1987. Salt tolerance studies in different cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Pak. J. Bot. 19:17-27.
Niazi MLK, Mahmood K, Mujtaba SM, Malik KA, 1992. Salinity tolerance in different cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Biol. Plant. 34:465-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923603
Ouzounidou G, Ilias IF, Giannakoula A, Theoharidou I, 2014. Effect of water stress and NaCl triggered changes on yield, physiology, biochemistry of broad bean (Vicia faba) plants and on quality of harvested pods. Biologia 69:1010-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0397-1
Parida A, Das AB, 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 60:324-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010
Qiu L, Wu D, Ali S, Cai S, Dai F, Jin X, Wu F, Zhang G, 2011. Evaluation of salinity tolerance and analysis of allelic function of HvHKT1 and HvHKT2 in Tibetan wild barley. Theor. Appl. Genet.122:695-703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1479-2
Royo A, Aragues R, 1999. Salinity - yield response functions of barley genotypes assessed with a triple line source sprinklers system. Plant Soil 209:9-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004549927123
Sairam RK, Tyagi A, 2004. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Sci. 86:407-21.
Sbei H, Shehzad T, Harrabi M, Okuno K, 2014. Salinity tolerance evaluation of Asian barley accessions (Hordeum vulgareL.) at the early vegetative stage. J. Arid Land Studies 24:183-6.
Sharma SK, Goyal SS, 2003. Progress in plant salinity resistance research: need for an integrative paradigm. In: S.S. Goyal et al. (eds) Crop production in saline environments. Food Products Press, NY, USA, pp 387-407.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J144v07n01_15
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), 2007. SPSS Base 16.0 User’s Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
Tavakoli F, Vazan S, Moradi F, Shiran B, Sorkheh K, 2010. Differential response of salt-tolerant and susceptible barley genotypes to salinity stress. J. Crop Improv. 24:244-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2010.481547
Wang WB, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Dengand XP, Kwak SS, 2009. Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 47:570-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.02.009
Witzel K, Matros A, Møller ALB, Ramireddy E, Finnie C, Peukert M, Rutten T, Herzog A, Kunze G, Melzer M, Kasparâ€Schoenefeld S, Schmülling T, Svensson B, Mock H-P, 2018. Plasma membrane proteome analysis identifies a role of barley membrane steroid binding protein in root architecture response to salinity. Plant Cell Environ. 41:1311-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13154
Wu H, Shabala L, Zhou M, Su N, Wu Q, Ulâ€Haq T, Zhu J, Mancuso S, Azzarello E, Shabala S, 2019. Root vacuolar Na+ sequestration but not exclusion from uptake correlates with barley salt tolerance. Plant J. 100:55-67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14424
Xue W, Gianinetti A, Jiang Y, Zhan Z, Kuang L, Zhao G, Yan J, Cheng J, 2018. Roles of seed components in the growth of barley seedlings under salt stress. Cereal Res. Commun. 46:436-47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.025
Zhu J, Fan Y, Li C, Shabala S, Zhao C, Hong Y, Lv C, Guo B, Xu R, Zhou M, 2020. Candidate genes for salinity tolerance in barley revealed by RNA-seq analysis of near-isogenic lines. Plant Growth Regul. 92:571-82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-020-00662-9
How to Cite
Dhima, K., Vasilakoglou, I., Paschalidis, K., Karagiannidis, N., & Ilias, I. (2021). Salinity tolerance evaluation of barley germplasm for marginal soil utilization. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1830
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.