https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1855

Organic versus mineral fertilization: Assessing of yield and quality of durum wheat in marginal lands

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021): Special issue on "Innovative fertilizers for sustainable agriculture"
Submitted: 26 February 2021
Accepted: 2 June 2021
Published: 25 June 2021
Durum wheat, nitrogen management, grain quality, nitrogen use efficiency, organic fertilization, sustainable agriculture.
Abstract Views: 860
HTML: 22
PDF: 475
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Durum wheat is often cultivated in marginal areas with great management difficulties. Organic fertilization is a sustainable agricultural practice that allows preserving the environment, but its limit can be the reduction of yield and quality of crops, also in cereals. The aim of research was to evaluate the effects of the organic fertilization on yield and quality of Simeto, a variety of durum wheat, cultivated for two years in three different sites of the internal hill of Campania Region (San Giorgio la Molara, SGM; Ariano Irpino, AI; Sant’Angelo dei Lombardi, SAL). SGM was a sandy-clay-loam soil, with high fertility, while AI and SAL were clay soil. The organic fertilization (ORG), based on roasted leather, was compared to mineral fertilization (MIN) and the not fertilized treatment (N0). In SGM, crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI) were significantly higher than AI and SAL until the flowering (about 2- and 4-fold more, respectively). MIN and ORG significantly boosted CGR compared to N0, while for LAI, ORG was never different from N0. The two-years value of yield was 3.0 t ha–1; in SGM, it reached 4.2 t ha–1, and it was 54.6% more than the mean value of AI and SAL, while N0 was not different from MIN of AI and SAL. ORG yield was lower and not different from NO in AI, where the lowest values of 1000 kernels weight, and hectolitre weight were also recorded. MIN and ORG increased the number of spikes per square meter: 27.0%, and 12.8% over N0, respectively, but ORG showed an 11.2% decrease compared to MIN. The 1000 kernels weight reached the highest values in SAL, without differences between N0, MIN, and ORG. The values of protein and gluten percentage were highest in AI and SGM (about 13.5%, and 11.7%, respectively), but without differences between ORG and MIN in the 3 sites for protein percentage. The worst value of the vitreousness was recorded in SAL (52.3%), six-fold more than that of AI (8.2%), probably due to the high rainfall. NUE reached the highest value in SGM in the first year, when it was significantly different from AI and SAL (0.036 vs 0.030 t kg–1). Overall, the effect of nitrogen fertilization type results sitespecific; indeed, organic fertilization had the same performance of mineral in the site with better soil (low clay content, high nitrogen, and organic matter content) and climate conditions.

Highlights
- Organic fertilization based on roasted leather was compared to mineral fertilization in three marginal environments for two years.
- Effect of organic fertilization on wheat yield, grain quality and nitrogen use efficiency was site-specific.
- Yield of plants organically fertilized was lower than mineral fertilization in the two environments less fertile and with a high clay content.
- Nitrogen use efficiency of organic fertilization was lower than mineral in the two environments less fertile and with high content of clay.
- Grain protein and gluten percentage were lower in the site with higher rainfall.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Barraclough PB, Howarth JR, Jones J, Lopez-Bellido R, Parmar S, Shepherd CE, Hawkesford MJ, 2010. Nitrogen efficiency of wheat: genotypic and environmental variation and prospects for improvement. Eur. J. Agron. 33:1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.01.005
Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Philipps L, Hatch DJ, Cuttle SP, Rayns FW, Goslin P, 2002. Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply available nitrogen? Soil Use Manage. 18:248-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2002129
Campbell CA, Davidson HR, Winkleman GE, 1981. Effect of nitrogen, temperature, growth stage and duration of moisture stress on yield components and protein content of manitou spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:549-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps81-078
Cerný J, Balík J, Kulhánek M, Casová K, Nedveˇd V, 2010. Mineral and organic fertilization efficiency in long-term stationary experiments. Plant Soil Environ. 56:28-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/200/2009-PSE
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation EC No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling, and control. Off. J. Eur. Union L 250(18):1-84.
David C, Jeuffroy MH, Laurent F, Mangin M, Meynard JM, 2005. The assessment of Azodyn-Org model for managing nitrogen fertilization of organic winter wheat. Eur. J. Agro. 23:225-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.08.002
El-Khayat GH, Samaan, J, Manthey FA, Fuller MP, Brennan CS, 2006. Durum wheat quality I: Correlations between physical and chemical characteristics of Syrian durum wheat cultivars. Int J. of Food Sci. Tech. 41:22-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01245.x
Ercoli L, Lulli L, Arduini I, Mariotti M, Masoni A, 2011. Durum wheat grain yield and quality as affected by S rate under Mediterranean conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 35:63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.03.007
Fagnano M, Fiorentino N, D’Egidio MG, Quaranta F, Ritieni A, Ferracane R, Raimondi G, 2012. Durum wheat in conventional and organic farming: yield amount and pasta quality in Southern Italy. Sci. World J. 1:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/973058
Flagella Z, Giuliani MM, Giuzio L, Volpi C, Masci S. 2010. Influence of water deficit on durum wheat storage protein composition and technological quality. Eur. J. Agron. 33:197-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.006
Garrido-Lestache E, López-Bellido RJ, López-Bellido L, 2005. Durum wheat quality under Mediterranean conditions as affected by N rate, timing and splitting, N form and S fertilization. Eur. J. Agron. 23:265-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.12.001
Gooding MJ, Davies WP, 1997. Wheat production and utilization: systems, quality and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford.
Kho RM, 2000. On crop production and the balance of available resources. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 80:1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00135-3
López-Bellido L, Fuentes M, Castillo J, López-Garrido F, Fernández E, 1996. Long-term tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat yield under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Agron. J. 88:783-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800050016x
Mader P, Hahn D, Dubois D, Gunst L, Alfoldi T, Bergmann H, 2007. Wheat quality in organic and conventional farming: Results of a 21year field experiment. J. Sci. Food Agr. 87:1826-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2866
Magid J, Henriksen O, Thorup-Kristensen K, Mueller T, 2001. Disproportionately high N-mineralisation rates from green manures at low temperatures- implications for modeling and management in cool temperate agro-ecosystems. Plant Soil. 228:73-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004860329146
Marinaccio F, Blandino M, Reyneri A, 2016. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and quality of durum wheat cultivated in Northern Italy and their interaction with different soils and growing seasons. J. Plant Nutr. 39:643-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1087027
Mehmood MA, Ibrahim M, Rashid U, Nawaz M, Ali S, Hussain A, Gull M, 2017. Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands. Sustain. Prod. Consumpt. 9:3-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.003
Mondini C, Cayuela ML, Sinicco T, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Bertolone E, Bardi L, 2008. Soil application of meat and bone meal. Short-term effects on mineralization dynamics and soil biochemical and microbiological properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40:462-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.09.010
Nocente F, De Stefanis E, Ciccoritti R, Pucciarmati S, Taddei F, Campiglia E, Mancinelli R, 2019. How do conventional and organic management affect the healthy potential of durum wheat grain and semolina pasta traits? Food Chem. 297:124884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.158
Ravindran B, Nagalakshmi C, Devi SG, Subramanian KS, Mandal AB, Sekaran G, 2013. Efficiency of hydrolyzed tannery solid waste for the growth and yield potentials on tomato. J. Plant Nutr. 36:795-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.756893
Rharrabti Y, Royo C, Villegas D, Aparicio N, GarcıÌa del Moral LF, 2003. Durum wheat quality in Mediterranean environments I. Quality expression under different zones, latitudes and water regimes across Spain. Field Crops Res. 80:123-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00176-4
Robinson FE, Cudney DW, Lehman WF, 1979. Nitrate fertilizer timing, irrigation, protein and yellow berry in durum wheat. Agron. J. 71:304-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100020021x
Rossini F, Provenzano ME, Sestili F, Ruggeri R, 2018. Synergistic effect of sulphur and nitrogen in the organic and mineral fertilization of durum wheat: grain yield and quality traits in the Mediterranean environment. Agronomy, 8:189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090189
Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA, 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 229-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11069
Tosti G, Farneselli M, Benincasa P, Guiducci M, 2016. Nitrogen fertilization strategies for organic wheat production: crop yield and nitrate leaching. Agron. J. 108:770-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0464
Tuttobene R, Avola G, Gresta F, Abbate V, 2009. Industrial orange waste as organic fertilizer in durum wheat. Agron. Sustain. Develop. 29:557-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009014
Ventrella D, Stellacci AM, Castrignanò A, Charfeddine M, Castellini M, 2016. Effects of crop residue management on winter durum wheat productivity in a long term experiment in Southern Italy. Eur. J. Agro. 77:188-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.010
Woose K, Lange D, Boess C, and Bögl KW, 1997. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods: results of a review of the relevant literature? J. Sci. Food Agric. 74:281-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199707)74:3<281::AID-JSFA794>3.0.CO;2-Z

How to Cite

Di Mola, I., Ottaiano, L., Sacco, A. ., Senatore, M., & Mori, M. (2021). Organic <em>versus</em> mineral fertilization: Assessing of yield and quality of durum wheat in marginal lands. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1855
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.


Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.