La risorsa alimentare globale e la capacità della scienza di superare i limiti attuali: Malthus ha ancora torto?

  • Giuseppe Zerbi Università degli Studi di Udine, Italy.
  • Paolo Ceccon | pceccon@uniud.it Università degli Studi di Udine, Italy.

Abstract

More than two centuries ago, T.R. Malthus postulated the human reproductive capacity being higher than the earth’s feeding capacity. As last decades’ population growth proved Malthus theory wrong, experts agree that this can be attributed to the application of technology in agriculture, leading to a significant enhancement of unit yields (first green revolution). However, heavy social and environmental costs were paid to reach such stunning achievements; moreover, they have seemingly gained a steady level, owing to increasing pressure of several limiting factors (e.g., soils, water, and nutrients availability; global change, etc.). Malthus prediction is therefore still relevant when trying to match population growth and food availability: the time seems ripe to launch a second green revolution, focused on lowimpact, easily accessible technologies.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Giuseppe Zerbi, Università degli Studi di Udine
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali
Paolo Ceccon, Università degli Studi di Udine
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali
Published
2011-09-23
Keywords:
Demography, population growth, food supply, agriculture, biotechnology
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 626

  • PDF: 421
How to Cite
Zerbi, G., & Ceccon, P. (2011). La risorsa alimentare globale e la capacità della scienza di superare i limiti attuali: Malthus ha ancora torto?. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 6(2s), e2. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.6.s2.e2